Who's in Chat? [Chat Now]
5:44 pm
October 19, 2009
OfflineThe dancing needs to come to an end very slowly. Like, "Oh wow! They kissed, now everything is super awkward." And then they don't kiss again for a while. Sort of like, let's acknowledge the fact that we want each other, but let's not start dating/fooling around right away just because we kissed once.
5:57 pm
October 12, 2009
Offline8:08 pm
October 24, 2009
OfflineI can deal with them dating other people and seeing that they still want each other, but I don't want a full season of blatant back and forth. I hate watching entire seasons of someone wanting more but unwilling to say anything. A few episodes as build up? Fine. But a pissed off Kate Beckett having to watch Castle date for 17 more episodes would be a bit much. And frankly, I NEED more to get through the Chirstmas hiatus!
:
I enjoy watching the dance as well. But I could see something to the extent of them investigating a crime scene and somehow someone with a gun still at the scene armed and dangerous and Castle taking the bullet in order to protect Beckett, not dying of course but keeping her from harm. That way he could show indirectly that he cares for her. Then at his hospital bed Beckett could have the alone time they need about to give him a kiss as thanks for saving her and right before they do they get interrupted by someone walking in. Lol can’t have them kiss though would ruin the dance.
After seeing Castle hop to his feet after hearing that the punch was spiked at that party and how much he cares for his daughter I could defiantly see him making some self sacrificing move to protect Beckett.
That’s just my opinion.
8:03 pm
October 19, 2009
OfflineAlexander said:
I enjoy watching the dance as well. But I could see something to the extent of them investigating a crime scene and somehow someone with a gun still at the scene armed and dangerous and Castle taking the bullet in order to protect Beckett, not dying of course but keeping her from harm. That way he could show indirectly that he cares for her. Then at his hospital bed Beckett could have the alone time they need about to give him a kiss as thanks for saving her and right before they do they get interrupted by someone walking in. Lol can’t have them kiss though would ruin the dance.
After seeing Castle hop to his feet after hearing that the punch was spiked at that party and how much he cares for his daughter I could defiantly see him making some self sacrificing move to protect Beckett.
That’s just my opinion.
I totally agree about his trying to protect Beckett and getting hurt while doing it.
8:38 pm
June 18, 2009
Offlinesarah_darling said:
I totally agree about his trying to protect Beckett and getting hurt while doing it.
What sort of patient do you think Rick would be?
I think he'd be a total handfull and I'm quite sure as he was getting better everyone would want shoot him.
10:02 pm
October 2, 2009
OfflineI totally see it the other way around. I could see Beckett getting hurt because of Castle not staying behind like she told him to… or him getting himself into a scrape that she has to come and rescue him from (like the Russian mob poker game). I can't see Castle being anywhere near that heroic.
11:55 pm
The longer they draw out the romance, the longer the show will run. That, I think, is the bottom line.
I'm a huge fan of the 80s show "Who's The Boss?", and that show just about holds the record for an unconsumated relationship. And after waiting 7 almost painfully-long seasons and 175 grueling episodes for Tony and Angela to get together, we didn't even get to see a wedding. But the show was a Nielsen top ten every season, and it's still considered one of the best tv romances. Those of us who are devout fans have learned what it means to appreciate the subtleties of a relationship.
Shows from "Moonlighting" to "Lois and Clark" all had the same problem. Once that tension was broken, rating plummeted. Even "Buffy" and "Friends" ran into ratings trouble when the tension was gone — which is why Ross and Rachel spent most of the show's 10-year run apart. Check out this article to see what I mean: http://www.post-gazette.com/tv…..2owen7.asp
Personally, I live for the stolen glances and the awkward moments, for the will they or won't they moments. I hope we don't even see a Castle/Beckett kiss until the end of this season. I thought the handshake was wonderfully appropriate and was further proof of their attraction. They are so unsure of themselves around each other and are so self-conscious that they woudn't even hug! That's the makings of a great romance! We need to see these characters grow as individuals and then discover what they can have together. By my calculations, that should take a good four or five seasons.
10:20 am
October 8, 2009
Offlineangie1379 said:
The longer they draw out the romance, the longer the show will run. That, I think, is the bottom line.
I'm a huge fan of the 80s show "Who's The Boss?", and that show just about holds the record for an unconsumated relationship. And after waiting 7 almost painfully-long seasons and 175 grueling episodes for Tony and Angela to get together, we didn't even get to see a wedding. But the show was a Nielsen top ten every season, and it's still considered one of the best tv romances. Those of us who are devout fans have learned what it means to appreciate the subtleties of a relationship.
Shows from "Moonlighting" to "Lois and Clark" all had the same problem. Once that tension was broken, rating plummeted. Even "Buffy" and "Friends" ran into ratings trouble when the tension was gone — which is why Ross and Rachel spent most of the show's 10-year run apart. Check out this article to see what I mean: http://www.post-gazette.com/tv…..2owen7.asp
Personally, I live for the stolen glances and the awkward moments, for the will they or won't they moments. I hope we don't even see a Castle/Beckett kiss until the end of this season. I thought the handshake was wonderfully appropriate and was further proof of their attraction. They are so unsure of themselves around each other and are so self-conscious that they woudn't even hug! That's the makings of a great romance! We need to see these characters grow as individuals and then discover what they can have together. By my calculations, that should take a good four or five seasons.
You do make a good case however, Castle isn't a huge success just yet. A third season is not guaranteed. So far we've seen their relationship grow stronger as each episode progresses. The season fanale for season 2 is where I want to see a huge progress forward. Why, cause it might be the last time we see a Castle and Beckett. I am being pessimistic. With the way some of these studios cancel shows I have to be.
10:57 am
October 24, 2009
OfflineYou know, I actually disagree that a couple finally getting together is what causes ratings to plummet. And frankly, Moonlighting had some other problems rather than just getting a couple together. That far oversimplifies things imho.
IMHO, it takes talent to get a couple together and keep it interesting. It is based on more than just sex/sexual chemistry which is something that the writers have already mastered with Castle and Beckett. The personalities is what makes them work. Beckett isn't afraid to call Castle on his crap and he isn't afraid to put his two cents out there. This could continue if they dated, kissed, whatever IMHO. If we get say, 5 seasons or more and they did get married, I think they could still have that amazing dynamic in trying to keep their personal life and work seperate. At work, I can see Beckett treating him as she always has. The stolen moments, that kind of thing could keep people interested.
I personally don't enjoy watching sexual tension play out for years. There is no reward, no payback and will they/won't they just gets old. Mulder and Scully were like this on the X Files and I simply stopped caring and stopped watching. There is a fine line between watching a relationship based on only sex and watching more than just a handshake. And honestly, I want to see Castle/Beckett together sooner rather than later because as much as I personally adore this show, unless ratings get better, a 5-10 year run isn't realistic IMHO.
11:36 am
June 3, 2009
OfflineGreenyJess said:I totally see it the other way around. I could see Beckett getting hurt because of Castle not staying behind like she told him to… or him getting himself into a scrape that she has to come and rescue him from (like the Russian mob poker game). I can't see Castle being anywhere near that heroic.
Agree. Although you never know, Rick may surprise us all… But it's definitely more probable that it would be Beckett who would get hurt.
Banner by petal of roses
12:35 pm
October 2, 2009
OfflineMost Users Ever Online: 587
Currently Online: Admin, Leftfield, He-Touches-Things, evesix, lvncastle, lv2bnsb, Carrie, Scott, iheart2784, Piffi, Shena, Morrison, KBRC
98 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
2 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
dmcw: 3399
Nev827: 3279
Alie: 3135
Jamz: 2644
Leftfield: 2492
He-Touches-Things: 2364
KalliopePL: 1924
unniw: 1738
MissWanderer: 1640
sarah_darling: 1626
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 685
Members: 8759
Moderators: 2
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 6
Forums: 112
Topics: 3555
Posts: 112428
Newest Members: Biazar, wolfbarb, emilygower, TheObsessive, hagen11, bek23, razzleedazzle, Myms, tbatt247, tcardec
Moderators: Admin (4771), addonchat (-1)
Administrators: Admin (4771)
Log In
Register
Home





:
All RSS
Usage Policy