Who's in Chat? [Chat Now]
Topic RSS
5:30 pm
September 5, 2009
Offline5:36 pm
March 8, 2010
Offline5:37 pm
April 15, 2010
Offline5:45 pm
May 24, 2010
OfflineThe site died just when I hit the enter to post the news.
I'm glad that maybe he will come back later, perhaps in the episode about the murder of Beckett's mother? I wouldn't mind some added continuity.
At the same time I do not like the idea that Andrew Marlowe would run another procedural paralell with Castle. I respect him and he must be a very hard working professional, but a day has only 24 hours even for him. I can not imagine that somebody could do two primetime shows at once without the need to set preferencies – and a new show always requires more attention than an established one.
6:14 pm
March 8, 2010
Offlinehalaci said:
The site died just when I hit the enter to post the news.
I'm glad that maybe he will come back later, perhaps in the episode about the murder of Beckett's mother? I wouldn't mind some added continuity.
At the same time I do not like the idea that Andrew Marlowe would run another procedural paralell with Castle. I respect him and he must be a very hard working professional, but a day has only 24 hours even for him. I can not imagine that somebody could do two primetime shows at once without the need to set preferencies – and a new show always requires more attention than an established one.
You've just listed some of the reasons why I think that it's just talk. Andrew Marlowe seems pretty dedicated to Castle and there are only so many hours in a day. I don't take the talk of a spin-off seriously, but it might be a case of what happened with Dana Delaney. ABC put her in a different show altogether, and I might be wrong, but wasn't that in part because they were impressed with her work on Castle?
It sound's more to me like they might like to have him back, in a recurring role, but that's exactly the talk we heard regarding Dana Delaney too. And nothing happened. And, as Andrew Marlowe also seemed to kick the question back to the network, I'm not taking any of it too seriously.
6:31 pm
July 26, 2010
OfflineThat could be fun, depending on how we will like Pasdar's character in the two-parter. But I agree with halaci, I don't see how Marlowe could run two shows at once, without neglecting any.
This was probably just an idea, but too complicated to carry out. I wouldn't mind seeing Det. Fallon back from time to time, in Castle, which is probably a lot more likely than a spin-off.
7:08 pm
October 27, 2010
OnlineLeftfield said:
halaci said:
The site died just when I hit the enter to post the news.
I'm glad that maybe he will come back later, perhaps in the episode about the murder of Beckett's mother? I wouldn't mind some added continuity.
At the same time I do not like the idea that Andrew Marlowe would run another procedural paralell with Castle. I respect him and he must be a very hard working professional, but a day has only 24 hours even for him. I can not imagine that somebody could do two primetime shows at once without the need to set preferencies – and a new show always requires more attention than an established one.
You've just listed some of the reasons why I think that it's just talk. Andrew Marlowe seems pretty dedicated to Castle and there are only so many hours in a day. I don't take the talk of a spin-off seriously, but it might be a case of what happened with Dana Delaney. ABC put her in a different show altogether, and I might be wrong, but wasn't that in part because they were impressed with her work on Castle?
It sound's more to me like they might like to have him back, in a recurring role, but that's exactly the talk we heard regarding Dana Delaney too. And nothing happened. And, as Andrew Marlowe also seemed to kick the question back to the network, I'm not taking any of it too seriously.
Obviously I know lil about this dude, but I would have FLOVED it if they some how kept Dana Delanay as a recurring FBI agent. So far she has been my favorite guest star and is way cooler than Will ever was.
I don't think you could ever really create a Castle "spin-off". It's not like Greys Anatomy and Private Practice or the Law&Order franchise, where the formula is fairly easy to recreate (Authors following detectives don't just fall out of the sky). They might like the character, but it would be harder to take it much further as a legitamite "spin-off"
7:43 pm
February 3, 2011
OfflineAlie said:
Leftfield said:
halaci said:
The site died just when I hit the enter to post the news.
I'm glad that maybe he will come back later, perhaps in the episode about the murder of Beckett's mother? I wouldn't mind some added continuity.
At the same time I do not like the idea that Andrew Marlowe would run another procedural paralell with Castle. I respect him and he must be a very hard working professional, but a day has only 24 hours even for him. I can not imagine that somebody could do two primetime shows at once without the need to set preferencies – and a new show always requires more attention than an established one.
You've just listed some of the reasons why I think that it's just talk. Andrew Marlowe seems pretty dedicated to Castle and there are only so many hours in a day. I don't take the talk of a spin-off seriously, but it might be a case of what happened with Dana Delaney. ABC put her in a different show altogether, and I might be wrong, but wasn't that in part because they were impressed with her work on Castle?
It sound's more to me like they might like to have him back, in a recurring role, but that's exactly the talk we heard regarding Dana Delaney too. And nothing happened. And, as Andrew Marlowe also seemed to kick the question back to the network, I'm not taking any of it too seriously.
Obviously I know lil about this dude, but I would have FLOVED it if they some how kept Dana Delanay as a recurring FBI agent. So far she has been my favorite guest star and is way cooler than Will ever was.
I don't think you could ever really create a Castle "spin-off". It's not like Greys Anatomy and Private Practice or the Law&Order franchise, where the formula is fairly easy to recreate (Authors following detectives don't just fall out of the sky). They might like the character, but it would be harder to take it much further as a legitamite "spin-off"
Actually, it all depends on the success of a particular show and the strength of its fanbase. Criminal Minds Spin-Off Suspect Behavior premiered yesterday night to better ratings than the original (I know the comparison is unfair because the original has been running for a few years and their is normally heightened interest in the pilots if they are worth a look) and the Bones' spin-off is scheduled to premiere on Fox later this year.
So, it isn't as though a Castle spin-off couldn't work. I think it is important to remember that A. Marlowe and his support staff are in this business for the money (Not the only motive of course). So, it wouldn't be unfair for them to think about extending a successful franchise beyond the current show. Yes, they would have to divert their attention to the new show for a little while. But, if the original has a loyal fanbase and strong ratings, it gives them every opportunity to explore other ideas, knowing that the original show isn't going to last forever. Whether the idea comes to fruition, the show gets picked up by the network and turns out to be successful or not is a completely different matter altogether. Just my honest opinion.
8:27 pm
May 3, 2010
Offline10:30 pm
January 5, 2010
OfflineI wouldn't be too concerned. I'm sure Andrew Marlowe's priority right now is Castle and he'll put off considering a show for Adrian until Castle is done or he feels like he has taken it as far as he can. Running a show like he does takes a lot more time than we all think and I doubt he'd want to stretch himself too thin.
12:54 am
May 24, 2010
OfflineThe only thing what bothered me in the interview was the last sentence:
I leave any further decisions to the network, but, regardless, I would do a show with Adrian in a heartbeat
All the other were just industrial blurb, but this suggested that even if it is – I'm sure – nothing more than just a blurb now, he would like to participate in it if it goes further. I very rarely so selfish to wish something bad to somebody just because it would be good for me, but I hope people won't like Agent Fallon enough to be worth the spinoff idea.
BTW: Alie, a spinoff need not be the same kind of show as the "parent", it takes only the character, not the storyline or the environment, so they would not need another writer to follow Agent Fallon. The best example is the planned (and then cancelled) idea of the spinoff with the PE guy in House.
4:07 am
May 6, 2009
Offline4:49 am
May 24, 2010
Offlinespinja said:
All this flap and the episodes haven't even aired yet…
advance PR, I guess.
For a minute I feared the "spin-off" was going to be Ryan and Esposito – which would be a great show, except that they cannot leave Castle without causing major damages…
Yes, that's another interesting question. Normally the idea of a spinoff comes when and if a supporting character is loved by the audience but they have no more role in the original storyline. Building a new show on them could spare some promotion costs and could give a good start. Why would it worth to leak plans of a spinoff even before the actual character were introduced? Maybe I will hate him from the first moment. (Though this general theory has changed, see the plans of Bones spinoff.)
Most Users Ever Online: 587
Currently Online: He-Touches-Things, ChrisS, Alie, dmm, 1-and-done, majster, sonnenschein77, CastleFan17, Aanakin, SeannysMom, Urkelnomically, Piffi, Hedgehogvampire, Shena, Genelle, mariadelao
86 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
dmcw: 3399
Nev827: 3279
Alie: 3132
Jamz: 2644
Leftfield: 2492
He-Touches-Things: 2355
KalliopePL: 1924
unniw: 1738
MissWanderer: 1640
sarah_darling: 1626
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 685
Members: 8752
Moderators: 2
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 6
Forums: 112
Topics: 3551
Posts: 112312
Newest Members: Myms, tbatt247, tcardec, Castlemaniac, aninha21, bela516, nanno2024, rogue17, CastlePedia, deballou
Moderators: Admin (4769), addonchat (-1)
Administrators: Admin (4769)
Log In
Register
Home



Banner/Icon by: petal of roses


Usage Policy