Who's in Chat? [Chat Now]
Topic RSS
5:18 pm
May 24, 2010
Offlinehttp://www.tv.com/five-minutes…..24199.html
He is asked why castle asks Beckett regarding Alexis and not Gina? IMHO tha answer shows that even the cast has no sense what are these LIs for.
He tells why can Beckett give advice – but not why a man not asking this advice from her private partner, who is by the way his ex-wife at the same time.
5:27 pm
January 15, 2010
OfflineThanks for posting halaci. It's funny…he didn't really answer the Beckett/Gina advice or Martha/Chet questions directly. I mean he said Castle asks Beckett about Alexis because he spends the most time with her and because you do that with your friends (I know that's what they are right now, but lets hope we don't get planted in that territory), but he avoided mentioning Gina at all, just as his character has been doing lately.
Banner by petal of roses; icon by shaded color
5:30 pm
September 29, 2010
OfflineI think Castle is going to the one with the most useful advice. Beckett grew up differently than Gina, more grounded, and that's how he wants Alexis to be.
It's also interesting that he says that Castle speaks to Beckett because that's who he's always around. That doesn't say much for Gina, IMO.
5:30 pm
October 28, 2009
Offline5:51 pm
May 24, 2010
OfflineShadows_21 said:
I think Castle is going to the one with the most useful advice. Beckett grew up differently than Gina, more grounded, and that's how he wants Alexis to be.
It's also interesting that he says that Castle speaks to Beckett because that's who he's always around. That doesn't say much for Gina, IMO.
How do you know that Beckett did grow up differently than Gina? We know absolutely nothing about her except her name and that sometime in the past she was married to Castle for God knows how long. Oh yes, and she is his publisher, she is sexy and blond.
OK, if normally meaningless informations are withhold, people start making conspiracy theories. I can only think that Ep 5 will partly revolve right around this question – why does Castle ask an outsider about things what are belonging to the family and to the responsibility of the family.
5:55 pm
September 29, 2010
Offlinehalaci said:
Shadows_21 said:
I think Castle is going to the one with the most useful advice. Beckett grew up differently than Gina, more grounded, and that's how he wants Alexis to be.
It's also interesting that he says that Castle speaks to Beckett because that's who he's always around. That doesn't say much for Gina, IMO.
How do you know that Beckett did grow up differently than Gina? We know absolutely nothing about her except her name and that sometime in the past she was married to Castle for God knows how long. Oh yes, and she is his publisher, she is sexy and blond.
OK, if normally meaningless informations are withhold, people start making conspiracy theories. I can only think that Ep 5 will partly revolve right around this question – why does Castle ask an outsider about things what are belonging to the family and to the responsibility of the family.
What I mean is that, even if Beckett did grow up with money, she doesn't act like it. Gina embraces the upper class lifestyle and riches, but Beckett is more conservative; she's a better role model for Alexis, IMO.
6:10 pm
July 12, 2010
OfflineI agree that it's kind of weird the way they've been handling Gina off screen through these first 3 episodes. There's hardly been any mention of her. I just think that it's pretty OOC for Castle to not talk about his signficant other/LI to Beckett and the boys. I think we all can agree that Castle still is clueless that he broke poor Beckett's heart before the summer, so I don't think Castle's lack of talking about Gina is out of "courtesy" or anything like that. In the first episode, I totally understand. Everyone was mad at Castle, and that wasn't the focus of the episode, so leaving Gina out except for Beckett's comments in the interrogation scene is believable. But the last episode, I don't get. While I am totally fine with Gina not being on-screen, it is odd that Castle wouldn't have talked to her about his predicament with Alexis and the scooter. Just a line referencing a discussion like "Gina's advice was this…", or even Beckett asking "what did Gina think?" would have made the Castle-Gina relationship more believable. Maybe the writers are trying to minimize the angst after the season finale by not having Castle mention her or is it just because their relationship is not really that serious that he cares about her opinion (doubtful)? But that's not what the writers have lead us to believe is the point of having the LIs around this season. Is the absence of discussion about Gina meant to show maturity on Castle's part? Most of the time when he discussed women in his life before, it was with some sexual reference (deep fried Twinkie, "comforting", etc), with the exception of Kyra. But then again, I guess those were more flings than relationships. So does this mean things really are serious with Gina? I would imagine in some ways that they have to be even if the writers haven't shown us that. There's only so much one can learn about a person that they've already been in a committed relationship with. Castle and Gina are going on 5 months now, so I think the "re-getting-to-know-you" phase has passed. Next few episodes will be interesting to say the least!
6:12 pm
May 16, 2010
OfflineThanks for posting this.
The stuff about Beckett's anger over him not calling "rearing its ugly head again" is interesting. I can't really figure how this might come back into play, but if it allows them to actually have a real conversation about what happened and why it happened, then it can only be good. But the way Fillion talked about it there, I'm fairly sure we aren't done with the issue completely.
Seems like he avoided mentioning Gina at all. Instructions from the writers or the marketing bods, perhaps? They're being very very vague about both love interests at the moment, which is part reassuring, part worrying.
6:16 pm
September 29, 2010
OfflineDanny Franks said:
Thanks for posting this.
The stuff about Beckett's anger over him not calling "rearing its ugly head again" is interesting. I can't really figure how this might come back into play, but if it allows them to actually have a real conversation about what happened and why it happened, then it can only be good. But the way Fillion talked about it there, I'm fairly sure we aren't done with the issue completely.
Seems like he avoided mentioning Gina at all. Instructions from the writers or the marketing bods, perhaps? They're being very very vague about both love interests at the moment, which is part reassuring, part worrying.
It'll probably 'rear its ugly head' when they both get fed up with playing the friends card.
8:14 pm
March 25, 2010
OfflineI think Castle is going to the one with the most useful advice. Beckett grew up differently than Gina, more grounded, and that's how he wants Alexis to be.
How do you know that Beckett did grow up differently than Gina? We know absolutely nothing about her except her name and that sometime in the past she was married to Castle for God knows how long. Oh yes, and she is his publisher, she is sexy and blond.
Now from the article…
TV.com: Castle seems to be asking Beckett for a lot of advice about Alexis. Why is he asking her instead of his ex-wife and current girlfriend, Gina?
Nathan Fillion: “I think one of the things that attracts Castle to Beckett is that she’s the polar opposite to who he is. She’s very grounded, she’s very realistic, and she’s a girl that grew up with, apparently, a lot of the same phases that Alexis is going through.
Now my take is that Nathan is saying that he is the opposite of Beckett, and by extension, since he "didn't answer the question" about Gina, it might be assumed that Castle and Gina have similar "non grounded" backgrounds. He and Gina might be Ying Ying (a panda) not Yin Yang (opposites completing each other).
next…
Beckett still seems hurt that Castle didn’t contact her over the summer. How long will it take for her to get over it?
So Castle currently is not in the dog house but if he makes a major screw up sometime this year, we will see Beckett all hurt and upset again and then Ryan, Esposito and Montgomery closing ranks around her to protect her – and then Castle will be in the dog house. You know it might come up in an "adult" conversation and it might make Beckett feel like what the phone call from Royce did to her, but Castle will be there for her to vent / take it out on.
I always expected Castle to be a “cool dad,” as far as Alexis’ love life was concerned, but he doesn’t seem to be. Why not?
I liked his answer – he's every dad. But even those of us with friends to talk to about our kids and their relationships are freaked out about them and our precious little angels growing up. We "know" what we were like back then and will think the worst about the boys in their lives, while remembering what we actually did rather than what our raging hormones really wanted us to be doing. This is going to be an entertaining arc.
Are you disappointed that neither Castle nor the audience got to meet Chet, Martha’s late ex-boyfriend?
You go girl! Susan is great in this show!
I think the question of Beckett may simply be right place at the right time kind of thing – if he'd just received the pic on his phone Beckett was around it would make sense to him to ask her rather than dropping everything and calling or going to see Gina…right?
As for the issue of Gina not being mentioned much – I don't think it's being left out for any reason other than time. There's so much to try and fit into every episode there's probably just not enough time to make reference to Gina if it doesn't somehow fit with the existing context of the episode.
4:47 pm
February 6, 2010
OfflineAdmin said:
I think the question of Beckett may simply be right place at the right time kind of thing – if he'd just received the pic on his phone Beckett was around it would make sense to him to ask her rather than dropping everything and calling or going to see Gina…right?
As for the issue of Gina not being mentioned much – I don't think it's being left out for any reason other than time. There's so much to try and fit into every episode there's probably just not enough time to make reference to Gina if it doesn't somehow fit with the existing context of the episode.
I agree with you. I feel that Gina is left out because there is only so much that can be put into one episode and the stories so far just haven't revolved around her character. I also think that Beckett and Castle do spend a great deal of time together. They may even spend more time together than Castle and Gina, so he does ask Beckett for advice. It also helps Castle feel comfortable talking to Beckett about these things because of the fact that Beckett is someone Alexis looks up to and they are similar in a lot of respects.
6:12 pm
May 24, 2010
Offlinecastleobserver said:
Admin said:
I think the question of Beckett may simply be right place at the right time kind of thing – if he'd just received the pic on his phone Beckett was around it would make sense to him to ask her rather than dropping everything and calling or going to see Gina…right?
As for the issue of Gina not being mentioned much – I don't think it's being left out for any reason other than time. There's so much to try and fit into every episode there's probably just not enough time to make reference to Gina if it doesn't somehow fit with the existing context of the episode.
I agree with you. I feel that Gina is left out because there is only so much that can be put into one episode and the stories so far just haven't revolved around her character. I also think that Beckett and Castle do spend a great deal of time together. They may even spend more time together than Castle and Gina, so he does ask Beckett for advice. It also helps Castle feel comfortable talking to Beckett about these things because of the fact that Beckett is someone Alexis looks up to and they are similar in a lot of respects.
Technically it is right what Admin and you told, but storywise not. Yes, there is a limited time in an episode and the writers have to decide what informations are the must and what can be omit if necessary. If the Gina-line is constantly dropped even because there are no time for it – it means that it is not important enough to squeeze in. It's a contardiction in the concept that the LIs are important to show our heroes' development.
Who is asked: I can make 24 hour shifts with somebody, I won't ask advices or opinion on family matters only in case if I feel him/her close enough to show my closet.
8:23 pm
January 5, 2010
OfflineShadows_21 said:
Danny Franks said:
Thanks for posting this.
The stuff about Beckett's anger over him not calling "rearing its ugly head again" is interesting. I can't really figure how this might come back into play, but if it allows them to actually have a real conversation about what happened and why it happened, then it can only be good. But the way Fillion talked about it there, I'm fairly sure we aren't done with the issue completely.
Seems like he avoided mentioning Gina at all. Instructions from the writers or the marketing bods, perhaps? They're being very very vague about both love interests at the moment, which is part reassuring, part worrying.
It'll probably 'rear its ugly head' when they both get fed up with playing the friends card.
I'm thinking it "rears it's ugly head" when Castle confronts Beckett about hiding Josh and she says something like "Why do you care? What was I supposed to do all summer while you were with her in the Hamptons? Sit around on my butt? no way, Mister. I met him and we've been having a good time. Deal with it."
8:30 pm
September 29, 2010
OfflineNev827 said:
Shadows_21 said:
Danny Franks said:
Thanks for posting this.
The stuff about Beckett's anger over him not calling "rearing its ugly head again" is interesting. I can't really figure how this might come back into play, but if it allows them to actually have a real conversation about what happened and why it happened, then it can only be good. But the way Fillion talked about it there, I'm fairly sure we aren't done with the issue completely.
Seems like he avoided mentioning Gina at all. Instructions from the writers or the marketing bods, perhaps? They're being very very vague about both love interests at the moment, which is part reassuring, part worrying.
It'll probably 'rear its ugly head' when they both get fed up with playing the friends card.
I'm thinking it "rears it's ugly head" when Castle confronts Beckett about hiding Josh and she says something like "Why do you care? What was I supposed to do all summer while you were with her in the Hamptons? Sit around on my butt? no way, Mister. I met him and we've been having a good time. Deal with it."
Thing is, Castle most likely won't confront Beckett as it's not his place and she made it clear during the Demming arc that her private life is private. Once again, body language will be very important because they won't bring up the sore subject verbally, but we should see physical cues of what they're feeling/thinking. Espo and Ryan are a different story since they feel a kinship with Beckett and had her back when Castle left. They'll probably confront her on hiding Josh.
Most Users Ever Online: 587
Currently Online: belle_lover, rkcaskett, lvncastle, Alie, OldOldMan, Peta111, 1-and-done, majster, sonnenschein77, Filatic, Piffi, antpertor, Genelle
77 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
dmcw: 3399
Nev827: 3279
Alie: 3132
Jamz: 2644
Leftfield: 2492
He-Touches-Things: 2355
KalliopePL: 1924
unniw: 1738
MissWanderer: 1640
sarah_darling: 1626
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 685
Members: 8752
Moderators: 2
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 6
Forums: 112
Topics: 3551
Posts: 112312
Newest Members: Myms, tbatt247, tcardec, Castlemaniac, aninha21, bela516, nanno2024, rogue17, CastlePedia, deballou
Moderators: Admin (4769), addonchat (-1)
Administrators: Admin (4769)
Log In
Register
Home






Usage Policy