Who's in Chat? [Chat Now]
Topic RSS
8:20 pm
March 8, 2010
Offline8:42 pm
January 15, 2010
OfflineThanks for that video link Aaraynia! Good to see the interview with Nathan.
But Leftfield, I'm with you. And if there's an excuse needed, I want a fresh one. Yet I'd prefer them to throw caution to the wind and just go for it! Head toward the relationship…make it funny, make it sexy, make it interesting, and make it work. Interested to see the opinions from the panel tomorrow if this topic comes up to see if there is anything new.
Banner by petal of roses; icon by shaded color
8:45 pm
October 2, 2009
Offline10:08 pm
July 25, 2009
Offline10:29 pm
March 29, 2010
Offline11:06 pm
March 8, 2010
Offlinedmcw said:
Thanks for that video link Aaraynia! Good to see the interview with Nathan.
But Leftfield, I'm with you. And if there's an excuse needed, I want a fresh one. Yet I'd prefer them to throw caution to the wind and just go for it! Head toward the relationship…make it funny, make it sexy, make it interesting, and make it work. Interested to see the opinions from the panel tomorrow if this topic comes up to see if there is anything new.
They certainly have the chops to pull it off. I say, just tell a good story and people will watch, if the story calls for them to get together (which it does!!), then do it. There are so many ways to tell a great story with them in a relationship, don't tell me that it can't be done.
1:06 am
May 24, 2010
OfflineLeftfield said:
Ah man, Moonlighting, I spit in your general direction. Curse that show, with so many success stories of relationships on TV, why is that the one that people remember. Great video, by the way. Nice catch.
I totally agree, if I will hear Moonlighting again I will start vomiting. Unfortunately, seems that in Nathan it's a very strong belief, he is the only one who brings this up constantly. I can only hope that he has not such an impact on the writers to change the show according to this fear.
What I first demand is to let them to the point (in a short time, like till Christmas) where they are admitting to each other that they are both longing and looking for more than just professional partnership. From that point onward there is a lot of time (I count at least two seasons) to spend on the obstacle course with many throwbacks and partial climaxes at certain key points (like season finales). The important thing for me is that I want to see them fighting for each other, not hiding from each other. I'm not a script writer, but as a season has 22-24 episodes, even I could write at least as many potential personal conflicts what they have to overcome until the point of "and they lived happily ever after".
Also do not forget that we don't know anything about Stana's private life, but either there are no sane men anymore in LA and around her, or the chance that she will have a change in her status grows with every year and in that case I'm sure she will want a family. OK, it's not from one day to another, but it's not necessarily happens in the common order either (I mean propose-marriage-baby). So if the writers want a safe play on the long term future of the show, they let them in this intermediate relationship making a base for a believable and easy forward change if something happens in the real world.
1:27 am
April 4, 2010
Offline3:16 am
October 10, 2009
Offline7:17 pm
January 5, 2010
OfflineThanks so much for posting these vids, Aaraynia. I'm beginning to agree with you all about the whole moonlighting curse thing. Enough with it Nathan! Let it go! I'm with Stana. The writers and directors of this show are so clever and she and Nathan have such chemistry that I really think they could pull off putting them in a relationship and have the show work. Both always say that Castle & Beckett's version of foreplay is building theory and solving crimes, so why not put them together, mind you slowly, not in one hot and heavy swoop, and let the foreplay, banter, flirting, and occassional hook up carry them through.
And I have to say, I never thought anyone could look so hot in a Green Lantern t-shirt! (swoon!
) Lastly, what does he mean Firefly fans don't want him to take his shirt off?! This one does!
7:19 pm
October 26, 2009
OfflineI didn't quite get that aside about Stana's personal life, halaci. I couldn't care less about that, and I would think none of us do. What they do in their downtime is theirs alone, and it shouldn't interfere with their acting. Unrelated, as a specimen of the male extraction a few blocks from the studio, I tell you that there are lots of sane men around. And yes, men who like women. And who are not actors. Just to dispel the illusion.
Writing-wise, I tell you the problem: They get together, the relationship changes so much, it would be like watching a whole new show. You break expectations at your peril. A hit is not a sick puppy. You don't cure it.
What would change the most is Beckett. And all the things the two can do now, would be intolerable if they were in love. Financially, she wouldn't need to work. Emotionally, her drive works if there is no one in the present to protect. His tagging alone wouldn't be permitted. The list goes on.
The options to have them consummate aren't good: Let's say they have a one night, or a secret affair- once that ends, and they move on (otherwise scenario A gets in motion), he can't stay around, b/c he's not tied there, unlike Esposito and Ryan. It's not his job. Getting together, in whatever manner, means either he can't tag along or she is on leave, permanently or not. And then it truly becomes Moonlighting, which so many here seem to love.
11:56 pm
June 18, 2009
OfflineI'm not a fan of Moonlighting at all and am in the minority that I DON'T want Castle and Beckett to get together too soon (if at all). I think it would totally ruin the show. I love the teasing and bantering but them as an official couple doesn't thrill me one little bit.
Of course I would never stop watching, I need my weekly Nathan fix, but I would be really disappointed if they went down that tied boring old marriage/babies path. Our writers have far more talent to bore us to death with that ho hum melodrama.
I don't want to have to deal with squalling infants and dirty nappies on my favourite show thanks very much.
Most Users Ever Online: 587
Currently Online: She's Armed, lvncastle, ACF, Mikevp1, jerryst316, majster, Addledminds, Argous, littleMel45, Piffi, RicardoCastelo, nevada, librarian4u, Nicky
92 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
dmcw: 3399
Nev827: 3279
Alie: 3133
Jamz: 2644
Leftfield: 2492
He-Touches-Things: 2358
KalliopePL: 1924
unniw: 1738
MissWanderer: 1640
sarah_darling: 1626
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 685
Members: 8753
Moderators: 2
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 6
Forums: 112
Topics: 3551
Posts: 112349
Newest Members: razzleedazzle, Myms, tbatt247, tcardec, Castlemaniac, aninha21, bela516, nanno2024, rogue17, CastlePedia
Moderators: Admin (4769), addonchat (-1)
Administrators: Admin (4769)
Log In
Register
Home



You should kiss that girl while you are both young.



Usage Policy