The first, best, most accurate and only Castle fan site that allows you to interact with the Castle cast & crew

Forums

Who's in Chat? [Chat Now]

A A A

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search:

— Forum Scope —



— Match —



— Forum Options —




Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
More Nathan from Comic Con - Castle
July 24, 2010
7:56 pm
Aaraynia
Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 44
Member Since:
October 27, 2009
Offline
Home is where the heart is..at the moment that's LA and Sydney….the best of both worlds !
July 24, 2010
8:10 pm
Aaraynia
Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 44
Member Since:
October 27, 2009
Offline
Home is where the heart is..at the moment that's LA and Sydney….the best of both worlds !
July 24, 2010
8:20 pm
Leftfield
Hard Core Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 2492
Member Since:
March 8, 2010
Offline
3
0

Ah man, Moonlighting, I spit in your general direction.  Curse that show, with so many success stories of relationships on TV, why is that the one that people remember.  Great video, by the way.  Nice catch.

July 24, 2010
8:42 pm
dmcw
Hard Core Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 3399
Member Since:
January 15, 2010
Offline

Thanks for that video link Aaraynia!  Good to see the interview with Nathan.

But Leftfield, I'm with you.  And if there's an excuse needed, I want a fresh one.  Yet I'd prefer them to throw caution to the wind and just go for it!  Head toward the relationship…make it funny, make it sexy, make it interesting, and make it work.  Interested to see the opinions from the panel tomorrow if this topic comes up to see if there is anything new.

banner_Castle_dmcw_v4a.jpg Banner by petal of roses; icon by shaded color
July 24, 2010
8:45 pm
musiclover
Hard Core Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 1518
Member Since:
October 2, 2009
Offline
5
0

what was with comparing castle to the little mermaid kinda cute but totally dorky

July 24, 2010
10:08 pm
hdotmoss
Hard Core Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 192
Member Since:
July 25, 2009
Offline
6
0

Thanks for posting!

Lol.. she called him Jason at the end.

July 24, 2010
10:29 pm
rkcaskett
Hard Core Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 177
Member Since:
March 29, 2010
Offline
7
0

Wow … they are already shooting episode 2.

You should kiss that girl while you are both young.
July 24, 2010
11:06 pm
Leftfield
Hard Core Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 2492
Member Since:
March 8, 2010
Offline
8
0

dmcw said:

Thanks for that video link Aaraynia!  Good to see the interview with Nathan.

But Leftfield, I'm with you.  And if there's an excuse needed, I want a fresh one.  Yet I'd prefer them to throw caution to the wind and just go for it!  Head toward the relationship…make it funny, make it sexy, make it interesting, and make it work.  Interested to see the opinions from the panel tomorrow if this topic comes up to see if there is anything new.


 

They certainly have the chops to pull it off.  I say, just tell a good story and people will watch, if the story calls for them to get together (which it does!!), then do it.  There are so many ways to tell a great story with them in a relationship, don't tell me that it can't be done.

July 25, 2010
1:06 am
halaci
Hard Core Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 1391
Member Since:
May 24, 2010
Offline
9
0

Leftfield said:

Ah man, Moonlighting, I spit in your general direction.  Curse that show, with so many success stories of relationships on TV, why is that the one that people remember.  Great video, by the way.  Nice catch.


 

I totally agree, if I will hear Moonlighting again I will start vomiting. Unfortunately, seems that in Nathan it's a very strong belief, he is the only one who brings this up constantly. I can only hope that he has not such an impact on the writers to change the show according to this fear.

What I first demand is to let them to the point (in a short time, like till Christmas) where they are admitting to each other that they are both longing and looking for more than just professional partnership. From that point onward there is a lot of time (I count at least two seasons) to spend on the obstacle course with many throwbacks and partial climaxes at certain key points (like season finales). The important thing for me is that I want to see them fighting for each other, not hiding from each other. I'm not a script writer, but as a season has 22-24 episodes, even I could write at least as many potential personal conflicts what they have to overcome until the point of "and they lived happily ever after".

Also do not forget that we don't know anything about Stana's private life, but either there are no sane men anymore in LA and around her, or the chance that she will have a change in her status grows with every year and in that case I'm sure she will want a family. OK, it's not from one day to another, but it's not necessarily happens in the common order either (I mean propose-marriage-baby). So if the writers want a safe play on the long term future of the show, they let them in this intermediate relationship making a base for a believable and easy forward change if something happens in the real world.

July 25, 2010
1:27 am
castlefan88
Hard Core Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 102
Member Since:
April 4, 2010
Offline
10
0

Yes me too any more moonlightimg and I will also puke….Bounce

July 25, 2010
1:49 am
Aaraynia
Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 44
Member Since:
October 27, 2009
Offline
11
0
Home is where the heart is..at the moment that's LA and Sydney….the best of both worlds !
July 25, 2010
3:16 am
unniw
Hard Core Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 1738
Member Since:
October 10, 2009
Offline
12
0

Thanks for sharing, Aaraynia!

I wish I knew how to quit you.
July 25, 2010
7:17 pm
Nev827
Hard Core Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 3279
Member Since:
January 5, 2010
Offline
13
0

Thanks so much for posting these vids, Aaraynia.  I'm beginning to agree with you all about the whole moonlighting curse thing.  Enough with it Nathan!  Let it go!  I'm with Stana.  The writers and directors of this show are so clever and she and Nathan have such chemistry that I really think they could pull off putting them in a relationship and have the show work.  Both always say that Castle & Beckett's version of foreplay is building theory and solving crimes, so why not put them together, mind you slowly, not in one hot and heavy swoop, and let the foreplay, banter, flirting, and occassional hook up carry them through. 

And I have to say, I never thought anyone could look so hot in a Green Lantern t-shirt!  (swoon! Shock)  Lastly, what does he mean Firefly fans don't want him to take his shirt off?!  This one does!

"Make you a deal," she said. "I'll watch my ass, you watch the crowd." - Nikki Heat in Heat Wave Avatar by SKB
July 25, 2010
7:19 pm
1892Rojas
Hard Core Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 209
Member Since:
October 26, 2009
Offline
14
0

I didn't quite get that aside about Stana's personal life, halaci. I couldn't care less about that, and I would think none of us do. What they do in their downtime is theirs alone, and it shouldn't interfere with their acting. Unrelated, as a specimen of the male extraction a few blocks from the studio, I tell you that there are lots of sane men around. And yes, men who like women. And who are not actors. Just to dispel the illusion.  

Writing-wise, I tell you the problem: They get together, the relationship changes so much, it would be like watching a whole new show. You break expectations at your peril. A hit is not a sick puppy. You don't cure it.

What would change the most is Beckett. And all the things the two can do now, would be intolerable if they were in love. Financially, she wouldn't need to work. Emotionally, her drive works if there is no one in the present to protect. His tagging alone wouldn't be permitted. The list goes on. 

The options to have them consummate aren't good: Let's say they have a one night, or a secret affair- once that ends, and they move on (otherwise scenario A gets in motion), he can't stay around, b/c he's not tied there, unlike Esposito and Ryan. It's not his job. Getting together, in whatever manner, means either he can't tag along or she is on leave, permanently or not. And then it truly becomes Moonlighting, which so many here seem to love. 

July 25, 2010
11:56 pm
SydneyDeb
Hard Core Castle Groupie
Forum Posts: 954
Member Since:
June 18, 2009
Offline
15
0

I'm not a fan of Moonlighting at all and am in the minority that I DON'T want Castle and Beckett to get together too soon (if at all). I think it would totally ruin the show. I love the teasing and bantering but them as an official couple doesn't thrill me one little bit.

Of course I would never stop watching, I need my weekly Nathan fix, but I would be really disappointed if they went down that tied boring old marriage/babies path. Our writers have far more talent to bore us to death with that ho hum melodrama.

I don't want to have to deal with squalling infants and dirty nappies on my favourite show thanks very much.

Let me tell you something about crazy people. The sex is unbelievable.
Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 587

Currently Online: She's Armed, lvncastle, ACF, Mikevp1, jerryst316, majster, Addledminds, Argous, littleMel45, Piffi, RicardoCastelo, nevada, librarian4u, Nicky
92 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

dmcw: 3399

Nev827: 3279

Alie: 3133

Jamz: 2644

Leftfield: 2492

He-Touches-Things: 2358

KalliopePL: 1924

unniw: 1738

MissWanderer: 1640

sarah_darling: 1626

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 685

Members: 8753

Moderators: 2

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 6

Forums: 112

Topics: 3551

Posts: 112349

Newest Members: razzleedazzle, Myms, tbatt247, tcardec, Castlemaniac, aninha21, bela516, nanno2024, rogue17, CastlePedia

Moderators: Admin (4769), addonchat (-1)

Administrators: Admin (4769)