Danny Franks said:

Thanks for the link.

Yeah, I don't want to see Beckett's "intimate moments" with Josh, thank you very much. Don't want to see Castle's with Gina, either.

It's nice that Stana is so positive and upbeat about the idea, but when she says "everyone else" isn't, that's kind of depressing. And Nathan Fillion is wrong when he says people start changing the channel if two characters get together. Not only would all the angst and tension not disappear, but it is very possible to write interesting stories about a relationship developing. He's friends with Zach Levi isn't he? And Adam Baldwin too, obviously, so why doesn't he ask them how putting Chuck and Sarah together has worked for their show? Ratings are steady (if low, which they always were) and the show is better than it ever has been.

---

Yes, I wonder how much effect has Nathan's opinion to the scripts?
(Like Tom Selleck had on Blue Blood up to the level that they changed
the showrunner because ha didn't like the scripts what were written to
him.)

It's also very strange to me that why on forums (not only
here, similar discussion is on Hungarian forums as well) it is so
obvious to the viewers that if they stop hiding their true feelings from
each other it doesn't mean automaticly that they are belonging to each
other happily till the ethernity, it is seemingly something that can not
reach the perception level of Hollywood.

Chuck is really a good
example, as their stories with Sarah are at least as interesting and entertaining as
those were while they were the stereotype couple-apart, but now without the
frustration of the forced will-they-won't-they.

 

Very simply: people switch away from a couple only in case if there was nothing else interesting in them just being apart. Mediocre characters and annoying plotlines causes people to switch away, not seeing two happy people. (Not to mention, that being together with somebody doesn't mean constant happiness.) If the characters are good (and Castle's characters are not good, but excellent) and the storyline of the show was more than just "keeping them away as long as possible" it has way more potential in a couple than two single, independent people.

Theresa said:

Yeah okay, so I’m like the naive romantic on set,

because everyone else is like ‘noooo, it ruins it’, and I’m like ‘no it

doesn’t ruin it! You can be together and be really spicy and fun, like,

think Mr and Mrs Smith

PLUS her imitation of the girls going goo-goo-ga-ga over Victor…SOOO cute!Oh Stana )

---

Yes, I love that she always lives in her interviews, not just repeats sentences from PR materials. In some ways she is so Latin, speaks with her whole face, her hands and body. I've just seen the video what she picked as the Fan of the Week – it's a true love letter but she deserves it.

Stephanie…..

Thanks for the link.  It gives me hope in the things to come. There was even a suggestion of a kiss.  I'm sure if there really is a kiss, it will be a teaser, but I'll take what I can get.  

Very cute interview and pretty good editing too. Although they were interviewd separately it came over as one cohesive feature even with the jumping back and forth between Stana and Nathan.

I would love to see Beckett on her Bike but I'm sure the insurance co for abc would insist on a double.

Thanks for sharing the link!